[Jump to content]

Building Societies Association

Member's Login

Join | Forgotten Password

Building Societies Association

Feature

Mortgage Market Review – the long awaited package of proposed reforms is published

Contact: Victoria Barnard
Date: 20 Dec 2011
 
Print page  |   Email 

On 19 December 2011, the FSA published the full package of proposed reforms under the Mortgage Market Review (MMR).  This includes all proposed rules changes, the draft rules and a detailed cost benefit analysis.

In summary, the responsible lending proposals cover: Verification of Income (income must be verified in every instance, effectively banning self cert and fast track mortgages, but the FSA has not sought to prescribe the evidence a lender should obtain); affordability assessment (lenders will be required to take account of committed expenditure, basic essential expenditure, and basic quality of living costs, although the FSA is not proposing to prescribe the values that lenders must take into account for these items); interest rate stress testing and interest only (evidence of a believable repayment strategy must be obtained as part of the application process and again at least once during the term of the loan).

In relation to distribution and disclosure, the FSA are proposing a significant overhaul of the advising and selling process, by moving to a fully advised market except for in some very specific circumstances. 

Commenting on the mortgage regulation proposals, Paul Broadhead, Head of Mortgage Policy at the BSA, said:
 
"The devil is always in the detail but these proposals seem to represent a welcome shift in policy by the FSA.  No-one is looking for a regime that permits lax lending practices, however the original proposals were in danger of locking credit worthy borrowers out of the market or imprisoning those with immaculate payment records, but non-standard profiles, in their current homes and loans. 
 
"This seems to have been avoided which is good news for the self-employed, those in existing self certified mortgages and people with negative equity.  The new regulations appear to have struck a reasonable balance between allowing lenders flexibility when assessing affordability, whilst maintaining a sensible level of consumer protection.”

A number of the proposals appear to be sensible, and appear to embed practices already common and established across the mutual sector, however the BSA will be looking at the detail to ensure that the rules work in practice and there are no unintended consequences.

Broadhead continued:  "We are pleased that the FSA has addressed our concerns. A thriving and competitive market, which encourages innovation to support the ever changing needs of would-be home owners and home movers, is in all our interests."

 


Post a comment:





Follow the BSA on Twitter

Quick links for consumers

Find your lost building society account

Latest news

The Housing Hub launched to promote wider access to home ownership
16.05.2012

UK consumers adopt self-build but lag behind Europe
15.05.2012

New BSA Chairman elected
10.05.2012

Challenges ahead for consumers as financial services changes, warns BSA Chairman
09.05.2012

Seminars and Workshops

Newsbite

Standard and Poor’s: “UK building societies have survived the financial crisis in better health than the UK banking industry as a whole.”

April 2012

Parliamentary motion calls for Government action on mutuals' Coalition pledge

March 2012

Simple products – how can they be identified?

February 2012

Property sales slump – is there any good news?

January 2012

BSA responds on Government's ICB thinking

December 2011

Government publishes housing strategy

November 2011

Newsbite archive

Mortgage Matters

The Mortgage Market Review is here, but was it worth the wait?

February 2012

Mortgage Market Review - the long awaited package of proposed reforms is published

December 2011

Working Together puts Pressure on would-be Fraudsters

October 2011

Code Breaking in Europe

July 2011

The Proposed EU Directive on Credit Agreements Relating to Residential Property – A Bad Deal for Consumers?

May 2011

Mortgage Matters archive