Industry Responses

As well as proactively campaigning, the BSA frequently comments on consultative papers issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority, and by Government departments such as the Treasury or the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 

Keep in touch

Join our mailing list to receive alerts as new content is published.

Sign up for alerts.

Our response to FCA's consultation on regulatory fees and levies, CP 17/ 38

We argue for the "polluter pays" principle to be applied to the methodology for collecting the Money Advice Service debt advice levy.

View Industry Response

HMT review of the cash ratio deposits scheme

We suggest other beneficiaries of the Bank of England's unremunerated policy work are called upon to fund it.  

View Industry Response

BSA response to DCLG call for evidence on improving the home buying and selling process

The BSA's response to the DCLG's Call for Evidence on improving the home buying and selling process.

View Industry Response

Client money and unbreakable deposits

To be of interest and benefit to the maximum number of building societies (and probably banks), we believe firms should be allowed to deposit client money in unbreakable deposits of up to 95 days.  

View Industry Response

Pillar 2A capital requirements and disclosure

The BSA's response to PRA CP 12/17

View Industry Response

Pillar 2 Liquidity - second consultation

The BSA's response to PRA CP 13/17

View Industry Response

IPPR Commission on Economic Justice

A BSA submission to the Commission's work on supporting mutuals.

View Industry Response

Recovery planning

These requirements appear to go above and beyond the Bank Recovery and Resolution directive.  We are particularly concerned by the "playbook" and "fire drills".

View Industry Response

MiFIR trading obligation

The BSA responded to ESMA's consultation on the implementation of the trading obligation under MiFIR.

View Industry Response