Industry Responses

As well as proactively campaigning, the BSA frequently comments on consultative papers issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority, and by Government departments such as the Treasury or the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 

Keep in touch

Join our mailing list to receive alerts as new content is published.

Sign up for alerts.

Strengthening accountability in banking - FCA CP 16/26

This response supports the proposals in, and comments on, FCA 16/26, which consults on guidance on how the FCA will enforce the 'duty of responsibility', which is now in force under the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016.

View Industry Response

Strengthening accountability in banking - FCA CP 16/27

This BSA response supports the proposal in FCA CP16/27 that 'standard' - sometimes called 'notified' - non-executive directors (NEDs) should be subject to the regulator's individual conduct rules and to rule 4 of the senior conduct rules

View Industry Response

Our response to the FRC consultation on the triennial review of UK and Ireland accounting standards

We argue for a later implementation date and the development of a more proportionate approach to expected credit loss provisioning.

View Industry Response

Our response to a technical consultation on the Apprenticeship levy

More detail needed on how regulations will work in practice.

View Industry Response

BSA Autumn Statement submission

The BSA submission ahead of the Autumn Statement

View Industry Response

Our response to the FRC's invitation to comment on the future development of FRS 102

Knowing that changes to the standard will be carried out only within a triennial review brings certainty to our sector.  Building societies can plan with the assurance that FRS 102 is constant, and not subject to regular change.

View Industry Response

Changes to the Pension Protection Levy for 2017/18

We urge the PPF to amend its rules on the mortgage age variable for this triennium.  Its rigid reliance on Companies House data disadvantages mutuals and other non-corporates.

View Industry Response

Our response to HMRC's consultation on making tax digital

We question why such a monumental change is required at all for building societies when HMT/ HMRC designed the personal savings allowance to take out 95% of taxpayers of savings tax irrespective of future interest rate changes.  Scanty detail makes it hard to provide meaningful feedback but the implication is clear - very high costs and much disruption for building societies.

View Industry Response

Our response to the EBA's draft guidelines on liquidity coverage ratio reporting

We support the representations made by our European partner, the European Association of Co-operative Banks.  Our main concerns lie in proportionality, frequency and the calculation methodology.

View Industry Response