BSA comments on the Budget

The BSA comments on the Budget.

Stamp Duty, the Mortgage Guarantee Scheme and the upcoming review of the Bank Surcharge

Commenting on today’s Budget, Robin Fieth CEO of the Building Societies Association said:  

On Stamp Duty:

“It is good to see the Chancellor recognising the adverse impact that an abrupt 31 March end to the Stamp Duty reduction would have had on the housing market and home buyers.  We welcome the three-month extension announced today, which will give certainty to those who have already agreed home purchases or are near to doing so and continue the economic benefits of a fully functioning housing market.  Our hope is that it can do so without related price inflation.

“We also welcome recognition of the adverse effect that a future cliff-edge would have had with the announcement that the Stamp Duty nil band will be £250,000 from July to the end of September before dropping back to £125,000 on 1 October.  The Government has not kicked the can down the road but announced a plan to help to ease the market in England back to normality, we hope that the devolved nations will take a similar approach.”

On the Government Mortgage Guarantee Scheme:

“The Chancellor has recognised the difficulties faced by many, especially young people, who struggle to save a deposit to buy a home.  This can be a substantial barrier for many trying to realise their dream of home ownership whilst meeting the cost of rent and other living expenses.  The government-backed guarantee for those who have just a 5% deposit is welcome news and this scheme will run alongside private sector solutions to the low deposit problem. A number of building societies have already re-entered the 90-95% mortgage market in past months and demand is likely to remain high.”

On the review of the Bank Surcharge:

“We look forward to the review of the 8% Bank Surcharge which is paid by the largest building societies in the UK, in addition to banks.  The recognition of the value delivered by the banking industry and the need to tax it fairly was positive in tone and intent both of which were welcome.”