We have updated our Privacy Policy and our Cookies Policy. The cookies that we use make our website work and helps us to analyse how the site is used by our visitors and improve our services.
Allow activity tracking?
I want to manage my cookies - Find out more
As well as proactively campaigning, the BSA frequently comments on consultative papers issued by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority, and by Government departments such as the Treasury or the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Keep in touch
Join our mailing list to receive alerts as new content is published.
Sign up for alerts.
We welcome the PRA's move. But we also argue for a reduction in frequency for the production and review of the recovery plan for those firms eligible for simplified obligations, and for clarity on what "the degree of detail and analysis in a recovery plan should reflect the complexity and size of the firms" means.
BSA welcomes corrective prudential,action on new and fast-growing banks
Our written evidence to the House of Lords sub-committee on the draft Finance Bill 2020-2021.
BSA broadly supports PRA proposals but challenges PRA to be more ambitious in cutting compliance burdens
We support proposals set out in the consultation paper to strengthen operational resilience, but we ask for further clarification and guidance on some specific areas.
We urge the PRA to review all its deadlines, particularly the one for the review of legacy outsourcing agreements, which we believe should be extended until at least 2023. This is especially important if the prudential context element is going to draw third party arrangements into the material outsourced classification.
Industry calls for clarification on onerousness.
BSA supports continued CRD exemption for credit unions